Life is hard when a
person denies love; when they can't accept grace and insist on being
enough by themselves. This seems to be a theme in the story of J. Irvin Overholtzer; he
refused his parents' help and love (even when he desperately needed
it), he doubted his salvation was “perfect” enough since it
relied on his deeds, and he doubted whether he should even seek
converts since “the best I had to offer them was to... start
working for their salvation as I was doing” (The Indomitable Mr. O, pg. 57). I think that
to begin (and continue) a relationship with Christ means admitting
brokenness and a personal inability to face life's challenges. But
even more painful is knowing that love is just around the corner, and
still choosing to stay right where you are. Mr. O learned that the
hard way.
Like many Christians
who grew up in the church (myself included), Mr. O could relate to
Paul in his attempt to follow God's rules without experiencing His
love. Mr. O's zeal for God after he returned to the church reminded
me of Paul prior to his conversion: “I was thoroughly trained in
the law of our fathers and was just as zealous for God as any of you
are today” (Acts 22:3, NIV). The zeal could come under another
term: religious mania – excitement over the law rather than the
spirit. Even if a person's zeal remains strong, they have the
emptiness of a life under God's wrath.
Another way to say it
might be that experiencing the fear of God without a sense of His
love makes it difficult to live His way. How do I maintain a passion
for dry law without the warmth of God's love? Rather, the moment that
I am least willing to do what God has asked, I am most in denial of
His love. I see that the work to be done is all on me. The reverse is
true: experiencing the love of God is what makes it possible to do
His will. Mr. O said he was concerned that living as a Christian
under grace would encourage him and others to live recklessly. It
turned out that the experience of God's love “shed abroad in his
heart” delivered a purpose for him to live by Christ's standards.
However, as Mr. O's
story shows, once a person accepts the truth of God's unconditional
love, life does not become easier. Mr. O's moment of weakness in
prayer is an excellent example: after all this time of being
passionately driven to work and pray for children's evangelism, why
did he falter in praying for Russia? As far as the narrative tells,
there is no reason; it was simply a mental or spiritual block that
Mr. O depended on God to remove. But no matter how small a thing it
was, it frustrated his efforts on two separate occasions. Norman
Rohrer wrote, “Nothing ever came easy to J. Irvin Overholtzer...
every piece of ground was gained by trial” (pg. 104). I was amazed
to read that he had to pawn his overcoat while traveling the U.S. on
behalf of Child Evangelism; that on another occasion he went two days
without eating while meeting with other founders of CEF. Mr. O could
say with Paul, “I know what it is to be in need, and I know what it
is to have plenty” (Philippians 4:12, NIV).
I think that going
forward in my “support-raising adventure”, I can be less
concerned when confronted with failure, since I know that Mr. O
suffered plenty of “failures” even when doing God's will. Also, I
no longer have to hold myself to God's impossible standard – His
grace fills in what I cannot do. Mr. O focused on God's love, and
found himself drawn to reach children with that love. The more
focused I become on that, the less my inabilities will matter.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Add your thoughts!